Onboarding
Start here.
Five things to have, three steps, and then your first question.
What you needFive things, once.
- 01Wayne State AccessIDYour university sign-in, the one you use for Academica.
- 02Grid accountApply once, with the grid account request form.
- 03GlobalProtect VPNConnect it before you open the grid's portal.
- 04Claude Pro or MaxYour own plan, which includes Claude Code.
- 05BeethovenThe Chrome extension. Ask for access. Private listing, by invitation: after approval you receive an invitation at the Google account you gave.
Three stepsConnect once. Then ask.
-
Open OnDemand and sign in.
With GlobalProtect connected, open ondemand.grid.wayne.edu and sign in with your AccessID (how to connect).
-
Click the Beethoven icon, once.
It does the rest: it points your account at the lab's copy of Beethoven on the grid, starts your Claude Code worker there, and asks you to sign in to Claude one time.
-
Open claude.ai or the Claude app, and ask.
In Code, pick the environment named after your site, and type your question.
The worker is a job on the grid, not a program on your laptop: close the browser and it keeps going. You need the portal again only to stop it, or to start a new one.
Your first questionAsk it the way you would ask a colleague.
Is the female pelvis relatively wider?
- Opens the labels of CTSpinoPelvic1K;
dataset_labels.jsonsays which identifier is which bone. - Finds each femoral head centre (identifiers 32 and 33) and the width of the L4 body (23).
- Divides the distance between the heads by the L4 width, for every record.
- Compares females and males: a Welch test and Cohen's d.
- Draws the three panels below.
- Writes the report from the CSV it just made. The heavy pass runs as a SLURM job.
- 164 vs 162femoral head distance, female vs male, mm (mean)
- 50.2 vs 55.4L4 body width, female vs male, mm (mean)
- 3.29 vs 2.94head distance / body width, female vs male
- d = 1.09Cohen's d; Welch p = 2 × 10-43
The answer is yes. Male pelves are wider at the iliac crests in absolute terms (a), and the femoral heads sit about 163 mm apart in both sexes (b); on a smaller skeleton that is a relatively wider pelvis: 3.29 against 2.94 (391 females, 338 males) (c). The published ratio is 3.95 against 3.48; ours is lower because a body width taken from labels runs a few millimetres wider than a caliper endplate width, and the female to male ratio, 1.12 against 1.14, agrees. The far outliers are records where a femoral head was not where the label said; the medians do not move.
Every number above is in results/report.txt, which the script writes from results/pelvic_width.csv. The demo study's code is one 120-line script.
Your dataWhat goes where.
- You sign in to Claude with your own account, on your own plan.
- No protected health information, FERPA-protected records, data under an IRB protocol that has not approved this use, or export-controlled data in the working directory.
- Your prompts, the files the worker reads and every command's output go to Anthropic, and the session transcript is stored on Anthropic's servers.
- On a personal plan Anthropic keeps it five years if model training is on, and 30 days otherwise. No BAA covers a personal plan.
- The details: Beethoven's privacy statement and Anthropic's privacy policy.
Other ways to get involvedJoin the consortium.
Whether you are a radiologist, an ML researcher, a data engineer, or a clinician with imaging to contribute — there is a place for you here. The consortium grows through public pull requests and open conversation.
-
Contribute code or data
Open an issue or a pull request on GitHub. Dataset contributions are reviewed against our origin and licensing checklist.
GitHub organization → -
Collaborate on research
Interested in co-developing a benchmark or a study? Reach out to the project lead to start a conversation.
gregory.schwing@med.wayne.edu -
Students: start here
Templates, the demo study above, and a list of project ideas, in one public repository.
Student_Projects →
Go deeper with the six workshop tutorials.